It's Morrissey's Town

@izz_faisal @bennyhafiz nah some idea and inspiration :) but it’s not mine. Lol.

brentordono:

The glass is half-full.
One of the popular philosophical questions has been: ‘Is the glass half-empty or half-full?’ and being an advocate of dualism, tells me that it should always be one or the other. In this article I try to explain in which status the glass is in and why through my own observation and some knowledge on scientific concepts.
In a philosophical point of view, this question determines how a person thinks. The water in the glass is what we have; therefore, the glass is half-full to the optimist because of the things that he can still have while it is half-empty to the pessimist because of the things that he can lose until it is empty.
If the law of Physics can be defied such that water exists on the upper half of the glass and nothing below it, then perhaps we have a glass that is half-empty. But this can never be. In fact, the glass is ideally always full; 1/2 water and 1/2 air but we only refer to the water as its content as a basis for observation.
In its physical structure, the glass is referred to as in an empty state because as a container, it holds nothing(?). Thus from the bottom of the glass until its mid portion is the same as saying from ‘empty’ to ‘half-full’ so when it’s filled exactly to the brim it’s ‘full’, in the brink of overflowing. But stating this also gives us that a glass in a full state will have the brim until the mid portion as ‘full’ to ‘half-empty’ and when it’s rid of its contents all the way down to the bottom, it’s ‘empty’.
I have therefore established, that the status of the glass given its water level depends on the direction of change. When the glass is in the process of being filled, it would have to reach the half-full point until it’s full whereas if it’s being emptied, it would have to reach the half-empty point until it’s completely empty. So I ask, are we pouring or drinking? And for most, this is where the dreadful answer ends.
In another article that I’ve read, it asks; What if we don’t know the past status of the glass when we come across it? It says we should look for clues, such that lip marks or water clinging on the inner walls of the glass would suggest drinking or recent pouring and therefore the glass would have to be half-empty. It also said that if no clues exist but the water is cold, it may suggest that it could have been recently poured and thus the glass is in the state of half-full. The article goes on to say that when a ninja places the glass such that no clues exist, it is half-empty because the water is naturally evaporating. If the glass is left alone and untouched, it will take molecular steps to be empty through evaporation therefore it is naturally half-empty.
Taking all these into account, I first break the components down. Water is a substance in liquid state . It is inherently formless. Glass is a container and is in solid state. Science tells us that water will always take the shape of its container. So whether we are trying to drink from or fill a glass with water, we will always START by pouring water in the glass to contain or measure it. In effect, any glass is always half-full because the glass’ innate purpose in this scenario is to hold water in place which will only happen when water is poured in it so that it is on its way to being half-full. This idea also proves superior to that excellent argument about water evaporation. The simple answer is: Water will not be in that state where it can evaporate without first being in that state where it’s poured in the glass. By default, water must always be poured in the glass regardless of purpose thus the glass would reach the state of being half-full.

overheatin-g:

portamental:

successed:

dont-you-w-o-r-r-y:

tiffany1fugit:

l-umiere:

nerahsladnuh:

Einstein and his therapist.

I will always reblog this.

i’ve been looking for this picture for ages, i love it, something about it just…gets to me

//
// ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]>
// ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]>
// ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]>
// ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]>
// ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]>
// ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]>
// ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]>
// ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]>
// ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]>
// ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]>
// ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]>
// ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]>
// ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]>
// ]]]]]]]]]]]]>
// ]]]]]]]]]]>
// ]]]]]]]]>
// ]]]]]]>
// ]]]]>
// ]]>
“happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know”

I thought i lost this

Brilliant man

This would’ve been perfect for today’s SAT essay…

vintagegal:

Audrey Hepburn in Breakfast at Tiffany’s (1961)

People need to realize that Islam is not & will never be a violent religion. The Quran is clear on that, and the Quran never changes, nor does it altern. So to all the curious people? Your direct source is the Quran. Not the internet, not the medias, but simply the Quran. And until you read it yourself, you can’t be in a position to judge.

(Source: quranicquotes)

9:58 pm • 4 May 2013 • 39 notes

septagonstudios:

Lantomo

cuntscravemyattention:

I need some right now

♏